PodcastEvangelism & Discipleship

Do We Need to Redefine Unreached?

Matt Bennett explains why our arbitrary definitions are preventing us from truly obeying our global discipleship mandate.

Do We Need to Redefine Unreached? Matthew Bennett Answers

For decades, missiologists have assumed the priority of the “unreached”—and for good reason—building entire organizational strategies around it. But do we need to redefine this term? Matt Bennett, Ph.D., former IMB missionary and current Assistant Professor of Missions and Theology at Cedarville University, weighs in.

In a recent article, Matthew argues that we’ve taken the arbitrary 2-percent definition of “unreached” too far, countering that we need to consider both unreached people groups and unreached places. He also argues in another piece that we must shift our focus from “finishing the task” to being faithful in the constant disciple-making mandate. In this interview, we ask Matthew about the history of UPG emphasis and talk about Ralph Winter, Donald McGavran, and how the homogeneous unit principle morphed from description into prescription. Finally, we discuss the importance of unhitching our missiology from a narrow conception of eschatology so that we can focus on our present callings.

Nerds, this episode is for you. (And everyone else too, of course. We promise.)

Subscribe for More

Subscribe, rate, and review The Missions Podcast in iTunes, Google Play, Stitcher, or your favorite app to help us bridge the gap between theology and mission.

Share

Evangelism & Discipleship

View all